RealDealPolitics.com

The Twin Cities reports that a young student named Annie Grossman was assaulted by four black women for being a white, Sarah Palin supporter. Read full story here.

That’s just great. They won the election, but started violence anyway. Now, imagine what they had done if they had lost the election? Not just cute little Annie, but many of us would have been in danger of assault.

Riots by the Black Liberation movement were promised before the election, about what would happen if Obama lost.  Fortunately for our temporary safety from the racists within our country, he did not lose.

Of course, in the long run, we have sacrificed our safety, electing an inexperienced radical as president, who believes we can appease our enemies to achieve national security. Hundreds of years of history have shown that this doesn’t work, but who needs real history?

What the public schools and universities have taught us is that America is evil whenever it defends its borders and people.

Hardly anyone in this country had a racial problem with Obama. We’re past that. What we have a problem with is his radical socialist agenda and appeasement philosophy. In other words, a threat to capitalism and a threat to our national security.

The reason I point this out, is that you may not hear about it from anywhere else. Imagine if a black student got attacked by white people for supporting Obama.  We’re talking headlines, every major national news organization, for weeks.  The attackers would be lucky to make it to court before being hanged by a public lynch mob.

This occurrence of racism will be overlooked by the “mainstream” media, because they want you to believe that only white people are evil and racist. But the facts indicate otherwise.

Congratulations to racism for turning the tide in the election. Hatred and divisiveness have prevailed over common sense and common ground.

I’m just glad that young Annie’s life was spared in the vicious attack. It takes more bravery than you might think, to wear a Palin or Mccain button at one of today’s universities, which teach hatred, racism, and communism, among other skills that are not helpful in life or society.

For those that wish to continue in courage, don’t despair. I encourage you to bring up the debate in the public square, in the dorm, in the schools. If you feel your life is threatened, feel free to use the right to bear arms to defend yourself. For now, we still have that right, until the Obama administration takes it away.

Obama, Reid, and Pelosi: Weathering the Storm

 

Whilst the presidential election results are parsed and explained elsewhere in this site, we still need to interpret their meaning.  Allow me to shed some light on the issue.

 

The election of Obama may seem to indicate a mandate of change, but what change is that? As explained in other articles on this site, the Obama administration has a radical far-left socialist agenda that includes the following:

• Higher taxes for businesses, businesspeople, and most people that pay taxes
• Increased handouts to those who don’t pay the income tax and don’t work
• FOCA: Freedom of choice act to allow abortions without question in all situations
• An act to overturn DOMA: the defense of marriage act requiring 1 man, 1 woman
• Overturning the 2^nd amendment right to bear arms for individuals
• Appointing only radical unconstitutional judges with litmus test of pro-abortion
• Preventing new oil drilling and nuclear plants to ensure foreign energy dependence
• Leaving Iraq a quagmire by taking our troops out before it is resolved
• Expand government provided social welfare to new heights
• Create a massive income redistribution program run by the bureaucrats in DC
• Increase federal government spending for all social programs
• Decrease defense spending
• Appease enemies by having friendly talks and letting them do whatever
• Get rid of all our nuclear weapons

 

That’s a very frightening agenda by most standards. Next, we have to look at what the people actually voted for on specific issues:

• Lower taxes (many believe in the 95% tax cut impossibility)
• AGAINST homosexual marriage acts in all states, including CA who elected Obama
• To protect our borders against illegal foreign invaders

 

Other than the vote for Obama, it doesn’t look to me like people voted for a radical communist, leftist, or socialist agenda. It looks like people voted for lower taxes, less corporate welfare, and an end to the Iraq war, and they thought Obama could provide that.  

 

So the question remains, will President Obama attempt to implement his radical far left agenda, or will he govern from the center as the people have voted?  So far all signs are in favor of the radical agenda. Obama may have run as a populist, but he is so far to the left that he must be classified as a communist.

 

Senator Reid and Rep Nancy Pelosi are far left individuals too. Note how all the leaders of the Democrat Party are. This is why they failed to win the Presidency in 2000, despite a strong economy and incumbent VP, and in 2004 despite an unpopular incumbent President whose position on the global war on terror baffled most people who have forgotten 9/11 already and were brainwashed by the media.

 

They thought they had won out with Bill Clinton, telling him to run as a moderate and then unleash the far left socialist agenda.  However President Clinton, always putting his own popularity first, didn’t want to push any unpopular measures and continued to govern as a populist, enraging the leftists, including his wife, but keeping him in good standing with moderates, Democrats, and even many Republicans.

 

Alas, the Democrats have their radical president. They dressed him up, gave him some talking points and told him to run as a populist who will protect the little guy. He even stole the tax cut issue from the GOP!  The only thing stopping him from enacting the left’s communist agenda will be his own ego. There will be a backlash against raising taxes on anyone making under $250k, most of which are middle class.

 

If Obama is to enact the radical socialism, he will have to deal with a middle class revolt and increasing unpopularity, just like Jimmy Carter faced. If he continues with his appeasement policy towards our enemies and they begin attacking our people on our soil, people will become disgruntled and eager to show him the door, similar to President Carter. If our economy continues to tank like it did under Carter, the Misery Index will encourage people to fire him at the earliest possible time.

 

President Obama now faces the most serious decision of his life, and has two choices:

1. Stand up for the communist principles he has been taught and espoused his entire life, and enact a radical socialist agenda, raising taxes on businesses and working people, and increasing social welfare via wealth distribution; appeasing our enemies and show weakness in foreign policy.

2. Work towards his own popularity, govern from the center, and try to find common grounds between the left and right, and work to bring them together and try to make the ends meet. Continue the strong measures on foreign policy and the national security that we have had since the fateful terrorist attacks on 9/11.

 

Choice 1 would results in the most failed and unpopular presidency since Carter, which will result in a single term administration that will go down in history as a political and economic disaster of Carter proportions, that will take years to recover from. Remember, it took the economy four years just to recover from President Carter, and more to start improving again.

 

Choice 2 would result in a steady increase in Obama’s popularity, and ensure at least some success of his administration. It might even get him re-elected once he has the faith from people on both sides, that the radical agenda is not being pursued. This would also increase the respect that other counties have for our country and its President.

 

What will it be, President Obama? Fame or Infamy.

Many people are still dumbfounded and looking for answers on how their fellow voters could elect a half-term senator who’s never held a real job, and thinks that 95% of voters pay income taxes, as president. Let me shed some light on the situation.

The margin of Senator Obama’s victory in the Presidential Election (52.6% vs. McCain 46.1%) would seem to give him a mandate for his agenda of “change” in government, particularly when you add the fact that his Democrat party gained even more seats in Congress.

But what exactly is that agenda? Is it one of “tax cuts for all” or is it a massive redistribution of income via the highly inefficient bureaucracy of the federal government?

First, put aside the fact that there were more votes cast in some areas than there were registered voters, the thousands if not more of fraudulent voters registered by ACORN, and the fact that this will go down in history as the most fraudulent presidential election since 1960, if not in history.

Next, let’s take the most obvious and iterative point he made during his campaign: the 95% “everyone except the rich” tax cut.  Now, many of us, I would hope, probably know that this is impossible, since approximately 35% of adult citizens do not pay the income tax. But apparently, most do not know this.

A Rasmussen poll going into the election reported that 31% of voters thought Obama would cut their taxes, whereas only 11% expected a tax cut from McCain. So, Mr. Obama stole the tax-cut issue from the Republicans somehow.

But this goes against all knowledge. The Democrat Party has not supported tax cuts for a long time, and the facts are that the last Democrat president to cut taxes was JFK, and most Democrats in Congress, including Obama, have always voted against tax cuts, for anyone.

It probably didn’t help McCain that he voted against the Bush tax cuts, despite his excuse that he wanted spending cuts and no earmarks with it. But regardless, they pork-barreled the tax cuts through Congress, and everyone who paid taxes got a tax cut. Further, it was a regressive cut. Those that had paid more taxes got the same amount returned as everyone else.

What am I missing here? Nothing. I’m seeing the whole picture, whereas the approximate half (we’ll give him credit for that even though only 90% of the votes at maximum were legitimate) of people that voted for him, either don’t see that, or agree with his wealth redistribution policy.

Let’s break it down.  As aforementioned, about 35% of adults don’t pay the income tax. I think it’s safe to say they understand what a 95% tax cut is more than anyone: it’s a free handout for them!  I would imagine that it’s difficult for them to turn down a handout, regardless of their principles. So let’s say 30% of voters voted themselves a redistributive handout.

Next, we’re left with about 20% of voters who actually pay taxes, voting for Obama. Of these people, probably many of them believe they will actually get a tax cut, and others were just voting for “change” because they hate Bush, etc.

After all, the media has disseminated nothing but hatred for the Bush administration for the past 8 years, and many people want a candidate that the media approves of.  The understanding for some is that he will give them a tax cut, but even the poll above rates it as unlikely, with only 31% believing Obama will deliver on that promise.

McCain didn’t run on tax cuts for people, but rather making the Bush tax cuts permanent and lowering some of the highest corporate tax rates in the world. To people that understand economics like me, this was the win-win plan that we were looking for. However, this message was not well received by some of the tax-cut voters.

What was not mentioned about the Obama plan was that he lets the “Bush tax cuts expire” in two years, meaning everyone’s taxes get hiked again. So he starts by raising taxes on the “rich” meaning people or businesses with income over $250k, which then reduced to $200k, then $150k, and then $100k, and only Obama himself knows how low that threshold will go. My guess is it will be everyone that pays income.

Then, in 2010, he lets the tax cuts expire, meaning he raises taxes again. This is the absolute worst approach you can take to an economy that is having major problems right now. There are two ways that the wage-payers, including “rich” people and businessmen, can deal with higher taxes:
            1. Pass on higher prices to the consumer, if they can, preserving their infrastructure
            2. Cut jobs and/or cut wages

In other words, they can stick it to the consumer, or stick it to the employees. In reality, yes they could cut their own wages, but do you really expect them to?

About 48% of voters obviously understood that the McCain plan was better for the economy, regardless of whether they would be the individual recipient of a tax cut. Almost half of voters understood that redistributing income and raising taxes on wage-payers can not help us out of a recession.

That’s a decent number, but in order to increase it to a proper level of over 60%, you need to get that message out better. Ronald Reagan, otherwise known as Ronaldus Magnus, understood the value of cutting taxes and was able to get his message across to the people effectively. McCain was not.

Let’s break down the total election numbers in terms of who voted for what.

Obama voters:

·        25%     voted themselves a redistributive handout from the government but said “change”

·        10%     because he is black and can dance

·        10%     voted for “change”

·        5%       voted for a tax cut for the little guy, which is them

·        2.6%    fraudulent votes by ACORN, double voters, etc

McCain voters:

·        20%     keep taxes low and decrease taxes for business

·        10%     someone that loves his country rather than one who doesn’t

·        10%     someone with the experience to run a country

·        1.1%    because he is old and white

Other:

·        1%       voted for impossible candidates so they can’t be held liable for results

In one way or another, most people voted with their pocketbook. They voted for some form of a tax cut or redistribution to themselves. So, American’s greed has come full circle, and we’re left with a communist for president. Good job, congrats all around.

The real policy of change espoused by Obama and his current allies Reid and Pelosi in congress is a massive redistribution policy of social welfare that will increase the amount of Americans that are either dependent on government or controlled by government.

One glaringly obvious indicator that most people seemed to miss was Obama’s promise to raise taxes on oil companies. So, gas prices will go up basically. Just when Americans were getting tired of high gas prices, Obama guarantees an increase. That’s great.

So what can we count on if he follows through? Higher prices for goods and services (yes this includes food, clothing, and gas).  Lost jobs and lower wages for people employed by businesses that will have their taxes raised for being evil.

I wonder what the elections would have been like if they had let me get up on stage during the debates and explain the ramifications of each candidates tax policies. But then again, if the candidate can’t get it across himself, then he’s not that great a candidate.

Let’s just hope we can weather this economic storm that Obama has promised to turn into a hurricane.

 

 

 

Now that the presidential election of 2008 is apparently over, I’m hearing calls from the media, and Obama supporters, all across the fruited plain, about how we all need to unite and support our new President-elect.

These are the same people who have constantly bashed and berated President Bush for eight years, preaching hate and divisiveness every day, until they successfully turned the majority of public opinion against Bush.

The liberals, democrats, socialists, and communists (but then I just repeated myself several times) have done nothing but hate and disparage the President and his supporters for eight years.

The liberals have totally invested themselves to failure in Iraq. They actually want American troops to get killed, and fail, with the remainder coming home with their tails between their legs, waving the white flag of surrender. They want this all so that it will make Bush look bad, and make the liberals look like they were right about something, which they never are.

This is the same anti-American movement that halted all progress when they took over Congress two years ago.  The Democrats in Congress did nothing but bash President Bush and complain about all things Republican, while letting the housing and mortgage crisis spiral out of control.

They did nothing but preach divisiveness and partisanship.  The approval ratings of Congress reached an all-time low of around 10% this year, precisely because of this behavior.  Then they gained more seats in Congress? That’s really just difficult to believe.

Their President, Obama, has done nothing but complain about Bush, Mccain, and “eight years of failed Republican policies.” He has not offered any solutions to anything, besides surrender in Iraq and a tax cut to people who don’t pay taxes.

Let’s look at Obama’s bipartisan record.  When did he ever even attempt to unify Republicans, Democrats, and anyone in between? He staunchly toed the party platform of abortion, higher taxes, and higher government spending at every turn. He never participated in any attempt for bipartisanship or unity, much less led such an effort.

Obama preached communism as a community organizer in Chicago for several years, teaching that white people are evil and it’s time for lower class black people to participate in a communist revolution that would get even with the evil white man. Then he became a senator and backed the same causes.

“White folks greed runs a world in need.”  Wow, that’s a real unifying statement there. Yet, many white people apparently voted for the man as well. Obama happily went to a church espousing Black Liberation Theology for 20 years, a religion which teaches hatred and revenge against the White Man. That is the sign of a great unifier.

In case you’re still confused about the issue, read the full report on Barack Obama’s radical communist upbringing and connections, or watch the TV show. You just may learn something.

In the meantime, spare me the bullshit of calling us to unity, when we, meaning White Anglo-Saxon Protestants, have been the subjects of hatred, blame, and revenge for Senator Obama his entire life.

Obama and his communist buddies can get my support and unity when they espouse unifying conservative ideals, those which made this country great and expand opportunity and freedom. But what are the chances that he will suddenly wake up to reality and ditch his communist ideals? None, which is the same support he’ll get from me.

In the immortal words of Senator Hillary Clinton, “We need to stand up and say we’re Americans, and we have the right to debate and disagree with any administration!” As difficult as it is to listen to the Shrillary shriek that phrase, truer words have never been spoken. Just remember, that applies to the Obama administration as well.

People are now searching for answers on what in blazes just happened in the 2008 elections. Let me give you a brief timeline of the last eight years, so we can put this all in perspective.

2000/11/07: Bush elected president of US (heretofore POTUS, get with the terminology people) amid a slight economic recession. The very fact that he was elected turned the markets back around (basically the opposite of what’s happening now)

2001: Bush tax cuts succeed in getting the economy back on track. Democrat and media hatred for Bush increases.

2001/09/11:  We all know what happened, and it didn’t help the economy or anything else for that matter.

2001/10/07:  After what seemed like an eternity for those of us desiring revenge, aerial bombardment of Afghanistan by US military begins.

2002: Democrat and media hatred for Bush increases to new levels as his popularity soars in the wake of dealing with the terror crisis and economy. Some mention that he “got lucky” that it didn’t happen under Clinton. Sick but true.

2003/03/19:  US war against Iraq begins, with almost unanimous support of US Congress

2004:  Democrats in Congress flip flop all over the place in light of the fact that no nuclear weapons were found in Iraq, even though all intelligence agencies in the free world said there were.  The media is now complicit in labeling Bush as a liar.

2004: Democrats and media now claim there were no weapons of mass destruction (WMD) in Iraq, even though it is a well known fact that he used biological and chemical WMD against his own people, and the Kurds. The real question, “where did the WMD go?” was not asked by the media, nor was the answer desired.

2004/11/02: Senator John Kerry, running on an anti-war platform that he previously espoused during the Vietnam War, fails in his bid to unseat Bush despite the President’s declining popularity.

2005:  Disputes over the Iraq war and WMD continue as the war drags out and Potus popularity declines.

2006/11/05: Saddam Hussein hanged after being sentenced to death by a jury of his own people, most of which hated him for his crimes against them and humanity.

2006/11/07:  The GOP took a large loss in House and Senate on election day for basically doing nothing useful in Congress besides supporting the unpopular Iraq War.

2007: Barney Frank takes over the House Finance Committee, and resists efforts by Bush, Mccain, and others to have more oversight of the risky lending processes being espoused by Fannie and Freddie.

2007: Senator Obama’s popularity soars as he begins considering a campaign which would unseat the Democrat heir Hillary Clinton, whose popularity remains mixed.

2008: The housing and mortgage crisis caused by faulty lending practices, greed, and lack of appropriate oversight of Freddie and Fannie by Congress (Barney Frank), has now reached critical mass and is affecting the global economy.

2008: Democrats and the media blame everything on Bush and the GOP,  which has not had control of Congress for two years.

2008: Democrat voters cross over the aisle to vote for Mccain in GOP primaries, fearing any true conservative.

2008: Congress, run by Democrats, sinks to record low approval ratings around 10-12%.

2008/11/04:  Senator Obama is elected Potus and GOP loses more seats in Congress.

Here’s the short version. The economy was doing fine until the lending crisis caused by greed and lack of regulation by Democrats controlling Congress. (What’s the role of Congress again?)

The Democrats, with full complicity of the media, somehow blame the economic problems  problems on Republicans, who tried to persuade Congress into more oversight into the faulty lending problems. But the public, none the wiser, believe the lies of the leftist media.

Then we had the bailouts, which at that point had to happen to stave off a global economic collapse. Like it or not, we had to take our medicine.

It’s hard to tell whether the Democrats had planned to sabotage the economy in time for the election, or it just somehow happened at the right time for them. Perhaps it was a perfect economic storm that somehow gave them a crisis to blame on Republicans right before the election.  A crisis they could address by raising taxes and increasing social programs.

At any rate, the crisis happened. Without it, there would be nothing to blame on “8 years of failed Bush and Republican economic policies,” a phrase that was heard so often that it became as meaningless as it was in the first place.

The people voted for Democrats to run Congress in 2006, and they got exactly what Democrats will give them: nothing except failure to manage anything in government correctly, and more blaming of Bush for anything that goes wrong.

The unpopularity of the Iraq War certainly weighed into the decision of voters in both 2006 and 2008,  but with the “surge” and the MRAP vehicles and the recent elevated success of the US in Iraq and declining deaths of soldiers, the issue was losing steam.

The Democrats needed a  new issue that they could blame on the Republicans, and they got one just in time, in the form of an economic crisis, the year of the election. It’s almost unbelievable that it happened at the exact time they needed it, that’s why it reeks of deliberate sabotage. But that would be giving too much credit to the intelligence of Democrats.

The other part of the storm came in the form of Democrats fixing the GOP primaries by crossing over to vote for Mccain.  These voters knew they would get a socialist either way in their party, so they focused their attention on ousting any true conservative from the GOP primaries.

The majority of Republicans as the race narrowed down to three, supported Gov. Mitt Romney, the only true conservative candidate.  However, he fell under attack by Gov. Huckabee and the media for being a Mormon. Combine that with the crossover voters and he could not get over the hump to get the GOP nomination.

Can you imagine the media questioning a Muslim on their religion? Why, they would never dare, but a Mormon, well that’s fair game for them. After all, wasn’t it Mormon terrorists that attacked  us on 2001/9/11? Oh, no it wasn’t. But it will probably say so in history books being written by communists in the media.

Mitt Romney, the man who should have represented the GOP, and would have without Democrat intervention, would have laid waste to the idiot Obama in any debates. It wouldn’t have even been close. He has more intelligence, more knowledge, knows the issues better, and can make a point. Mccain, not so much.

Senator Obama is a man of very low intelligence, less than President Bush. Obama is borderline retarded, we’re talking single digit IQ.  The only thing he says is regurgitation of the communist brainwashing that he suffered for years at the hands of the public schools, Ivy league, the media, and the communists that he hung out with like Bill Ayers and Frank Marshall Davis.

Barack Obama is the most ignorant, naive, unintelligent person to ever be a major party nominee, much less Potus.  He  knows little about the issues. All he knows is, raise taxes and redistribute income, and then everything will be fine in his communist utopia.

Reality will set in soon enough, and it will be a harsh transition, when he and the country realize that the policies of socialism, communism, and appeasement don’t work. If he bothered to look at the real history of the Western World, he would see that these have been tried and untrue.

But we will have to go through it the hard way again, and find out again that it doesn’t work. In the meantime, our economy will get worse, like it did under Carter, terrorists and rogue dictators will be more emboldened to attack us, and quality of life will go down.

Mentioning President Carter is quite appropriate here. He is the closest Potus to Obama in terms of policies.  Carter was the biggest failure of any US Potus ever.  During his administration, the Misery Index reached an all-time high.

This is what miserable people like Carter do; they spread the misery.  That’s what communism is all about. If one person is miserable because of low income or no job, then everyone should share that misery. Carter did such a great job at spreading misery that he had the lowest vote percentage of any incumbent Potus in history.

This can be summed up in a quote from the great Winston Churchill: “The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socalism is the equal sharing of misery.”

Obama says that capitialists have tried to make a virtue out of selfishness. That about sums up his stance. Anyone who wants to keep more of their income rather than letting goverment confiscate it and redistribute it in a highly inefficient bureaucratic manner, is selfish according to him and his communist buddies.

Barack Hussein Obama is a communist that is ignorant and naive beyond all stretches of the imagination. He has learned nothing from the failed communist policies of the past, both in this country and others.  If he had learned, then he is downright evil to try to implement such policies on this country. That is also a possibility, but then we’d have to give him credit for having intelligence, which is highly unlikely.

Whatever the case, the people have supposedly elected him as Potus.  This shows that either the majority of people are communists, or they are ignorant. We know the former can’t be true, therefore we have to assume the latter.

Ignorance in this country is at an all time high.  Maybe it’s time to start the Ignorance Index.  We will definitely have to start tracking the Misery Index as well, because the next 2-4 years, Misery is going to reach new levels, thanks to the Ignorance that got us here.

The “mainstream” media, which is anything but mainstream, and completely out of touch with the majority of Americans, won’t report on this, as usual, so I will.

The Dow Jones Index suffered it’s largest one-day-after-election drop in history,  declining almost 500 points in reaction to a socialist president being elected on November 4, 2008.

The media claims it has nothing to do with the election. Really? Because that’s the only important economic announcement that was made. Let’s get real, people. The market reacted negatively to a president-elect that has an anti-business platform and agenda. Simple as that.

Senator Obama has promised to raise taxes on people that have six-digit incomes, and higher. These are generally the people that create jobs and businesses. He also promised to raise taxes on businesses with six-digit incomes, which are obviously companies that create business and jobs.

Raising taxes in a time like this is about as ignorant and idiotic move as any politician could ever make, and yet he has promised to do so, and people still elected him, supposedly. I still have my doubts about that by the way. Lots of fraudulent votes out there.

At any rate, if you were a business investor, and you heard that the president and congressional majority leaders are planning to raise taxes on businesses and businesspeople, how would your outlook be on business?  There’s only one answer: it’s negative.

Today, November 6, the Dow has already tumbled another 200 points before noon as I write. What a shame.

I predicted in an email to a friend yesterday, that the Dow would lose 500 yesterday, and continue to decline for the rest of the year. I was right about the first part, and I will likely be right about the remainder. I will go on record here as predicting below 7000 by the end of the year.

The Marxist, anti-business agenda of Mr. Obama is not good for Wall Street, not good for business, and therefore, not good for the economy.

I hope the bottom 40% that don’t pay income tax appreciate the handouts they will receive from redistribution of my income and that of other businessmen, because the rest of us are going to get screwed big time.

The bottom 40% may get a handout, but if they want a job or better wages, they should have thought a little harder before pulling the lever for a Marxist, because their handout will pale in comparison to the opportunities that could have been created for them with lower taxes on businesses and other wage-payers.

The truth is that the recent decline of the stock market over the last month or so has been largely a reaction to the realization that a communist president would likely be elected.  You didn’t hear the media even suggest anything like that did you?

The democrats can scream “failed Bush policies” until they’re blue in the face. Then again, they already have. But let’s be honest, the economy was fine until the Democrat party took over 2 years ago, and caused the housing / mortgage crisis. The failure is and always has been the Democrat way of dealing with the economy: anti-business and pro-special interest.

That’s why I’m here folks, to give you the real deal.

Not everyone needs to vote. Why? Because not everyone is competent enough in understanding the issues and candidates, to make an informed decision on who should be in public office. Sure, they’ve seen and heard $150 million per month worth of advertisements, and they might like what they see.

But do they really know anything about that candidate or his opponent? Do they know his background, voting record, career experience, and world view? How many actually know anything, at all, about their local congressional candidate besides their party affiliation?

Some may be easily swayed by a smooth talking politician who has never had a real job, never made an important decision, and was never responsible for the livelihoods of anyone, much less an entire district, state, or nation. But does that make them qualified to vote?

A homeless, jobless man may like what a candidate says about free handouts, but does that really help him or the economy? A business man understands how fiscal policies will affect his business and others. A family person may understand how policies will affect their family and community.

The truth is that many don’t understand the issues, don’t know what the candidates really represent, and therefore would hurt democracy by voting.

So please, if you’re ignorant, stay out of the ballot box. There’s no shame in that. In fact, you’ll be helping the country more by staying at work or home, than by injecting your uninformed two cents into the picture.

If challenged on why you didn’t vote, simply state, “I don’t like any of the candidates. They’re all a bunch of lying politicians.” Not only will you be right, but your know-it-all friend’s ego will be temporarily deflated.

The next time you hear a politician use the word ‘billion’ in a casual manner, think about whether you want the politicians spending your tax money.

A billion is a difficult number to comprehend, but one advertising agency did a good job of putting that figure into some perspective in one of its releases.

A.

A billion seconds ago it was 1959.

B.

A billion minutes ago Jesus was alive.

C.

A billion hours ago our ancestors were living in the Stone Age.

D.

A billion days ago no-one walked on the earth on two feet.

E.

A billion dollars ago was only 8 hours and 20 minutes,  at the rate our government  is spending it.

 

While this thought is still fresh in our brain… let’s take a look at New Orleans ..

It’s amazing what you can learn with some simple division.

Louisiana Senator, Mary Landrieu (D) is presently asking Congress for 

 

250  BILLION DOLLARS

to rebuild New Orleans .  Interesting number…  what does it mean?

A.

Well… if you are one of the 484,674 residents of  New Orleans  (every man, woman, and child) you each get $516,528

B.

Or… if you have one of the 188,251 homes in New Orleans , your home gets  $1,329,787.

C.

Or… if you are a family of four…   your family gets  $2,066,012.

Must be nice!

 

Attention Washington, D. C.!!

The following list of taxes is considered excessive:

Accounts Receivable Tax

Building Permit Tax

CDL License Tax

Cigarette Tax

Corporate Income Tax

Dog License Tax

Federal Income Tax

Federal Unemployment Tax (FUTA)

Fishing License Tax

Food License Tax

Fuel Permit Tax

Gasoline Tax Paid 10 Times

Hunting License Tax

Inheritance Tax

Inventory Tax

IRS Interest Charges (tax on top of tax)

IRS Penalties (tax on top of tax)

Liquor Tax

Luxury Tax

Marriage License Tax

Medicare Tax

Property Tax

Real Estate Tax

Service charge taxes

Social Security Tax

Road Usage Tax (Truckers)

Sales Taxes

Recreational Vehicle Tax

School Tax

State Income Tax

State Unemployment Tax (SUTA)

Telephone Federal Excise Tax

Telephone Federal Universal Service Fee Tax

Telephone Federal, State and Local Surcharge Tax

Telephone Minimum Usage Surcharge Tax

Telephone Recurring and Non-recurring Charges Tax

Telephone State and Local Tax

Telephone Usage Charge Tax

Utility Tax

Vehicle License Registration Tax

Vehicle Sales Tax

Watercraft Registration Tax

Well Permit Tax

Workers Compensation Tax

 

STILL THINK THIS IS FUNNY?

 

Not one of these taxes existed 100 years ago…

and our nation was the most prosperous in the world.

 

 

We had absolutely no national debt…

We had the largest middle class in the world…

and Mom stayed home to raise the kids.

 

What happened?

The Liberal Democrat Party happened.

 

And I still have to press ’1′ for English.

In a third world country, a democratic republic with majority Christian population, a woman leaves her country to Kenya, marries a Kenyan, and gives birth to a boy. The boy, named Soetoro, is then is raised by radical muslims in Indonesia, where he became a citizen in order to attend school.  Then he is returned to a remote part of the former third world country his mother was a citizen of, and raised by his grandparents and communists.

 

Now a man, Soetoro becomes involved in municipal politics, working for communist organizations at the local level. He befriends a known communist and anarchist named Bill who admits, without remorse, terrorist acts including bombing government buildings in the name of his communist revolution, but was acquitted by a weak justice system on a techicality. Later, with the help of another felon named Tony, later convicted of political fraud, Soetoro buys his first house and moves into the neighborhood with Bill, Tony, and a man named Lou, a communist activist and anti-Semite.

 

Soetoro then launches a career for the national legislature in the home of Bill. With help from Bill and other communists and terrorists who specialize in fraudulent voter registrations, he is elected to the legislature.  Shortly thereafter, he gives an impressive speech in front of millions for a presidential candidate who lost. After two years in the legislature, the communist implant launches his own presidential campaign.

 

The presidential candidate then collects unheard of amounts of money from all over the world, including communist countries and terrorist organizations in the Middle East, out-collecting and outspending his opponent by a 4-1margin. Despite the millions he is spending, his brother remains impoverished in a hut in Kenya, living off the equivalent of 1$USD per month, and his aunt remains in a slum.

 

Regardless, the candidate convinces the majority of the public that he will help them out by redistributing income and increasing taxes on only the very rich top 1%, while formulating a plan to increase taxes on all who have income. Terrorist organizations come out of the woodwork, with Hamas, Hezbollah, and Kadafi endorsing the candidate as their muslim brother who will be their ally.

 

In the meantime the national media, controlled by the communist movement, covers up all the negative information about the candidate. They don’t report on the fact that he is not a citizen of the country, thus not eligible to be president. They make no mention that he is part of the communist party, and that his allies are communists and terrorists. They don’t report on the fact he is endorsed by radical muslim terrorist groups which are disapproved of by the large majority of the Christian nation.

 

In fact, they even neglect to inform on the fact that he campaigned for his 1^st cousin named Adinga in Kenya, whose radical muslim mobsters burned Christians alive in churches after he lost the election. Ironically, Adinga was awarded the position of prime minister by the UN’s Kofi Annan, in a move to appease his radical mob.

 

The communist activists with which he worked beforehand early in his career, now run amuk around the country, fabricating voter registrations. They register children, cartoon characters, and anyone else that is not eligible to vote. They pay people in crack to come up with voter registrations. They register single people dozens of times to vote. They are paid to do this by Soetoro’s campaign.

 

The candidate now stands poised to become the first communist president of “his” country, which was founded on freedom, democracy, and capitalism, and basic Judeo-Christian principles.

 

Unfortunately, Soetoro’s opponent is a man who served his country his entire life, beginning in the military, where he fought in a war and was held captive and tortured as a POW. After his return as a war hero, he got elected to the legislature and continued to serve his country, fighting for less government and lower taxes for his constituents, and more liberty for the people. Now his aging opponent is losing his last chance to serve his country in the highest capacity as president.

 

Fortunately for us, all this can happen in a third world country, but not in ours. This is the United States, arguably the world’s only superpower. Or is it?

 

Barry Soetoro = Barack Hussein Obama

Bill Ayers is the domestic terrorist and communist who launched his political career.

Lou = the great Louis Farakhan

 

Let’s prevent this great nation from becoming a third world country with a communist dictator. There are enough of those around, all of which have one thing in common: an equal sharing of misery for the masses, corrupt and predatory governments, and economic disaster. We can do it, together. Say no to communism. Let’s keep this country the greatest.

 

Check out videos from the TV show on the home page of the Real Deal

Home page and videos