RealDealPolitics.com

People are now searching for answers on what in blazes just happened in the 2008 elections. Let me give you a brief timeline of the last eight years, so we can put this all in perspective.

2000/11/07: Bush elected president of US (heretofore POTUS, get with the terminology people) amid a slight economic recession. The very fact that he was elected turned the markets back around (basically the opposite of what’s happening now)

2001: Bush tax cuts succeed in getting the economy back on track. Democrat and media hatred for Bush increases.

2001/09/11:  We all know what happened, and it didn’t help the economy or anything else for that matter.

2001/10/07:  After what seemed like an eternity for those of us desiring revenge, aerial bombardment of Afghanistan by US military begins.

2002: Democrat and media hatred for Bush increases to new levels as his popularity soars in the wake of dealing with the terror crisis and economy. Some mention that he “got lucky” that it didn’t happen under Clinton. Sick but true.

2003/03/19:  US war against Iraq begins, with almost unanimous support of US Congress

2004:  Democrats in Congress flip flop all over the place in light of the fact that no nuclear weapons were found in Iraq, even though all intelligence agencies in the free world said there were.  The media is now complicit in labeling Bush as a liar.

2004: Democrats and media now claim there were no weapons of mass destruction (WMD) in Iraq, even though it is a well known fact that he used biological and chemical WMD against his own people, and the Kurds. The real question, “where did the WMD go?” was not asked by the media, nor was the answer desired.

2004/11/02: Senator John Kerry, running on an anti-war platform that he previously espoused during the Vietnam War, fails in his bid to unseat Bush despite the President’s declining popularity.

2005:  Disputes over the Iraq war and WMD continue as the war drags out and Potus popularity declines.

2006/11/05: Saddam Hussein hanged after being sentenced to death by a jury of his own people, most of which hated him for his crimes against them and humanity.

2006/11/07:  The GOP took a large loss in House and Senate on election day for basically doing nothing useful in Congress besides supporting the unpopular Iraq War.

2007: Barney Frank takes over the House Finance Committee, and resists efforts by Bush, Mccain, and others to have more oversight of the risky lending processes being espoused by Fannie and Freddie.

2007: Senator Obama’s popularity soars as he begins considering a campaign which would unseat the Democrat heir Hillary Clinton, whose popularity remains mixed.

2008: The housing and mortgage crisis caused by faulty lending practices, greed, and lack of appropriate oversight of Freddie and Fannie by Congress (Barney Frank), has now reached critical mass and is affecting the global economy.

2008: Democrats and the media blame everything on Bush and the GOP,  which has not had control of Congress for two years.

2008: Democrat voters cross over the aisle to vote for Mccain in GOP primaries, fearing any true conservative.

2008: Congress, run by Democrats, sinks to record low approval ratings around 10-12%.

2008/11/04:  Senator Obama is elected Potus and GOP loses more seats in Congress.

Here’s the short version. The economy was doing fine until the lending crisis caused by greed and lack of regulation by Democrats controlling Congress. (What’s the role of Congress again?)

The Democrats, with full complicity of the media, somehow blame the economic problems  problems on Republicans, who tried to persuade Congress into more oversight into the faulty lending problems. But the public, none the wiser, believe the lies of the leftist media.

Then we had the bailouts, which at that point had to happen to stave off a global economic collapse. Like it or not, we had to take our medicine.

It’s hard to tell whether the Democrats had planned to sabotage the economy in time for the election, or it just somehow happened at the right time for them. Perhaps it was a perfect economic storm that somehow gave them a crisis to blame on Republicans right before the election.  A crisis they could address by raising taxes and increasing social programs.

At any rate, the crisis happened. Without it, there would be nothing to blame on “8 years of failed Bush and Republican economic policies,” a phrase that was heard so often that it became as meaningless as it was in the first place.

The people voted for Democrats to run Congress in 2006, and they got exactly what Democrats will give them: nothing except failure to manage anything in government correctly, and more blaming of Bush for anything that goes wrong.

The unpopularity of the Iraq War certainly weighed into the decision of voters in both 2006 and 2008,  but with the “surge” and the MRAP vehicles and the recent elevated success of the US in Iraq and declining deaths of soldiers, the issue was losing steam.

The Democrats needed a  new issue that they could blame on the Republicans, and they got one just in time, in the form of an economic crisis, the year of the election. It’s almost unbelievable that it happened at the exact time they needed it, that’s why it reeks of deliberate sabotage. But that would be giving too much credit to the intelligence of Democrats.

The other part of the storm came in the form of Democrats fixing the GOP primaries by crossing over to vote for Mccain.  These voters knew they would get a socialist either way in their party, so they focused their attention on ousting any true conservative from the GOP primaries.

The majority of Republicans as the race narrowed down to three, supported Gov. Mitt Romney, the only true conservative candidate.  However, he fell under attack by Gov. Huckabee and the media for being a Mormon. Combine that with the crossover voters and he could not get over the hump to get the GOP nomination.

Can you imagine the media questioning a Muslim on their religion? Why, they would never dare, but a Mormon, well that’s fair game for them. After all, wasn’t it Mormon terrorists that attacked  us on 2001/9/11? Oh, no it wasn’t. But it will probably say so in history books being written by communists in the media.

Mitt Romney, the man who should have represented the GOP, and would have without Democrat intervention, would have laid waste to the idiot Obama in any debates. It wouldn’t have even been close. He has more intelligence, more knowledge, knows the issues better, and can make a point. Mccain, not so much.

Senator Obama is a man of very low intelligence, less than President Bush. Obama is borderline retarded, we’re talking single digit IQ.  The only thing he says is regurgitation of the communist brainwashing that he suffered for years at the hands of the public schools, Ivy league, the media, and the communists that he hung out with like Bill Ayers and Frank Marshall Davis.

Barack Obama is the most ignorant, naive, unintelligent person to ever be a major party nominee, much less Potus.  He  knows little about the issues. All he knows is, raise taxes and redistribute income, and then everything will be fine in his communist utopia.

Reality will set in soon enough, and it will be a harsh transition, when he and the country realize that the policies of socialism, communism, and appeasement don’t work. If he bothered to look at the real history of the Western World, he would see that these have been tried and untrue.

But we will have to go through it the hard way again, and find out again that it doesn’t work. In the meantime, our economy will get worse, like it did under Carter, terrorists and rogue dictators will be more emboldened to attack us, and quality of life will go down.

Mentioning President Carter is quite appropriate here. He is the closest Potus to Obama in terms of policies.  Carter was the biggest failure of any US Potus ever.  During his administration, the Misery Index reached an all-time high.

This is what miserable people like Carter do; they spread the misery.  That’s what communism is all about. If one person is miserable because of low income or no job, then everyone should share that misery. Carter did such a great job at spreading misery that he had the lowest vote percentage of any incumbent Potus in history.

This can be summed up in a quote from the great Winston Churchill: “The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socalism is the equal sharing of misery.”

Obama says that capitialists have tried to make a virtue out of selfishness. That about sums up his stance. Anyone who wants to keep more of their income rather than letting goverment confiscate it and redistribute it in a highly inefficient bureaucratic manner, is selfish according to him and his communist buddies.

Barack Hussein Obama is a communist that is ignorant and naive beyond all stretches of the imagination. He has learned nothing from the failed communist policies of the past, both in this country and others.  If he had learned, then he is downright evil to try to implement such policies on this country. That is also a possibility, but then we’d have to give him credit for having intelligence, which is highly unlikely.

Whatever the case, the people have supposedly elected him as Potus.  This shows that either the majority of people are communists, or they are ignorant. We know the former can’t be true, therefore we have to assume the latter.

Ignorance in this country is at an all time high.  Maybe it’s time to start the Ignorance Index.  We will definitely have to start tracking the Misery Index as well, because the next 2-4 years, Misery is going to reach new levels, thanks to the Ignorance that got us here.

The “mainstream” media, which is anything but mainstream, and completely out of touch with the majority of Americans, won’t report on this, as usual, so I will.

The Dow Jones Index suffered it’s largest one-day-after-election drop in history,  declining almost 500 points in reaction to a socialist president being elected on November 4, 2008.

The media claims it has nothing to do with the election. Really? Because that’s the only important economic announcement that was made. Let’s get real, people. The market reacted negatively to a president-elect that has an anti-business platform and agenda. Simple as that.

Senator Obama has promised to raise taxes on people that have six-digit incomes, and higher. These are generally the people that create jobs and businesses. He also promised to raise taxes on businesses with six-digit incomes, which are obviously companies that create business and jobs.

Raising taxes in a time like this is about as ignorant and idiotic move as any politician could ever make, and yet he has promised to do so, and people still elected him, supposedly. I still have my doubts about that by the way. Lots of fraudulent votes out there.

At any rate, if you were a business investor, and you heard that the president and congressional majority leaders are planning to raise taxes on businesses and businesspeople, how would your outlook be on business?  There’s only one answer: it’s negative.

Today, November 6, the Dow has already tumbled another 200 points before noon as I write. What a shame.

I predicted in an email to a friend yesterday, that the Dow would lose 500 yesterday, and continue to decline for the rest of the year. I was right about the first part, and I will likely be right about the remainder. I will go on record here as predicting below 7000 by the end of the year.

The Marxist, anti-business agenda of Mr. Obama is not good for Wall Street, not good for business, and therefore, not good for the economy.

I hope the bottom 40% that don’t pay income tax appreciate the handouts they will receive from redistribution of my income and that of other businessmen, because the rest of us are going to get screwed big time.

The bottom 40% may get a handout, but if they want a job or better wages, they should have thought a little harder before pulling the lever for a Marxist, because their handout will pale in comparison to the opportunities that could have been created for them with lower taxes on businesses and other wage-payers.

The truth is that the recent decline of the stock market over the last month or so has been largely a reaction to the realization that a communist president would likely be elected.  You didn’t hear the media even suggest anything like that did you?

The democrats can scream “failed Bush policies” until they’re blue in the face. Then again, they already have. But let’s be honest, the economy was fine until the Democrat party took over 2 years ago, and caused the housing / mortgage crisis. The failure is and always has been the Democrat way of dealing with the economy: anti-business and pro-special interest.

That’s why I’m here folks, to give you the real deal.