Social Security

Bachmann:         They keep raiding the funds. Obama stole $ millions from Medicare to use for Obamacare.

Romney:              Without stating views of his own, went on attack on Perry for his calling it a Ponzi, that it was unconstitutional and should be dismantled.  Clarified after Perry’s counterattack that he believed Congress raiding the SS fund was criminal.

Perry:    The system is broken and we need courage to transform it for those in mid career that don’t know whether it will be there or not.  Retaliated that Mitt stated in his book that SS was criminal.

Paul:      Said we should spend the money on SS instead of wars and other stuff we’re doing around the world. Young people should get out of SS and go it on their own.

Cain:      We need optional personal retirement accounts.  Instead of fed govt giving money to states, give it back to the workers.

Hunstman:          Americans don’t want to be frightened, they want solutions.  “We have the answers, we just don’t have the leadership.” Gave no specifics whatsoever.

Newt:   “I’m not worried about Romney and Perry frightening the American people, when Obama scares them every day.” (surprised by large amount of applause drawn.)  Obama has threatened to withhold SS checks, and politicians shouldn’t have the power to do that.  People should have control over their own accounts.

Santorum:           Wolf tried to get him to side with Perry or Romney, as if there hadn’t been several different views offered, to which he replied, “The question is, who’s with me?”  He said SS is in trouble and they need somebody with the courage to address it.

Balancing the Budget, Erasing Debt, without Compromising Senior Benefits

Newt:   We balanced the budget before starting in 1994, it’s not a theory.  If you modernize govt (strongamericanow.org) you can save $500 million a year.  “Check and see if the supercommittee of 12 in their august power, is willing sit down with that group and actually learn how to be smart rather than cheap.” $70-120 billion per year in Medicaid is being paid to crooks.

(Wolf then changed the subject to prescription drug benefits)

Santorum:           We can keep a RX program but we have to pay for it.  One size fits all system run by the govt is not the answer.  Obama thinks he knows how to purchase your medical care better than you.

Wolf then tried to get Perry to commit to voting to repeal the RX benefit for seniors that Bush passed.  Wolf: president’s don’t vote; they sign into law, or veto.

Perry:    No (on repeal). But it’s a big hole in the budget, and you have to find the savings while still delivering the service. They combined 10 agencies into 5 in Texas, and saved $5.3 billion by finding waste.  Then Wolf asked again would he repeal it, and Perry said that’s how I started the conversation.

Romney:              Would reform RX, Medicare, Medicaid, and SS.  We can’t just cut waste, we need to cut spending, which he would cap at 20% of GDP.  “We need to stop the growth of the fed govt, and start the growth of the private sector.”

Paul:      $1.5 trillion overseas on wars we don’t need to be in, we need to take that money and put it into here.  Need to cut dept’s of energy and education.

Bachmann:         The principal needs to change that fed govt is going to pay for everything for everyone.  We need to return to a society of personal responsibility.  (best answer)

What is the plan to get the economy moving forward again?

(Wolf rephrased:  What’s the first thing you would do, knowing Obama formally gave legislation to Congress today with his jobs plan?  That wasn’t the question, Wolf. We’re going post-Obama here.)

Huntsman:          “What we’re seeing play out in America is a human tragedy.”  People are dispirited, can’t find jobs, etc.  WSJ has endorsed his tax code reform plan.  We need regulatory reform and can’t go forward with Obamacare or Dodd/Frank.  We need to wean off “heroin-like” dependence on foreign oil and have energy independence.

Wolf then rephrased again for Perry:  Obama has offered all those tax credits, do you support that?

Perry:    Obama will pay for it by raising taxes.  “President spent $800 billion on the first stimulus package that created zero jobs. This one is $400B.  I can do that math on that one: half of zero jobs, is gonna be zero jobs.” President doesn’t understand how to free up business men and women and Wall Street by lowering their taxes and regulations.  “People are tired of spending money we don’t have on programs we don’t want.”

Bachmann:         With $1 trillion in new spending that you don’t pay for, the deficit can only go up.  They should have never raised the debt ceiling, giving Obama another blank check to spend.  It’s easy enough to turn around the economy, you just need the backbone to do it.

Cain:      “This economy is on life support.”  We don’t need govt picking winners and losers. “We need bold plans, like my 999 plan: 9% corp. tax, 9% income tax, and 9% natl. sales tax.  People say ‘you can’t do that, you don’t know how Wash works.’ I say, yes I do: it doesn’t.”

Wolf then tried to get Romney to give Perry credit for job creation in Texas. It was weird.

Romney:              Rattled off half a dozen things like balancing the budget.  Said Perry was dealt 4 aces in Texas and would have been a fool to fold them:  0 income tax, low regulation, right to work, oil in the ground, and GOP legislature.  That’s actually 5 aces but who’s counting.

Perry:    Obama has overseen loss of $2.5 million jobs.  Texas has created $1 million during the same time, which were rough times.  “You want to talk about some powerful job creation, tell the trial lawyers to get out of your state and stop costing business men and women.”  We cut taxes by $14 billion.

Paul:      Taxes and debt have doubled while Perry has been governor of Texas.  “You don’t have to pay for a tax cut, if you think about it that way, then the govt owns all the money.”

Newt:   In 4 years as speaker, America created more jobs than any state did during any of the governors did in their states during their tenure.

Federal Reserve:  Should it be audited and held accountable?

Santorum:           Yes, we need sound money.  “Obama’s economy would have to make a drastic improvement to become a disaster.”

Cain:      Yes. It’s scope should be narrowed and focused only on sound money.

Bachman:            The Fed can’t have this kind of power, making loans to foreigners, etc, and would not reappoint Bernanke, and would never have had the bailout.

Perry:    If you’re using the Fed for political purposes, that is treasonous.  Not a fan of using the Fed to cover up bad fiscal policy.

Romney:              People won’t invest in this country if they don’t have faith in our currency.

Taxes

Next, a young man from Napa asked: “Out of every dollar that I earn, how much do you think I deserve to keep?” to great applause from both audiences.

Huntsman:          Has a tax program that lowers the flat rate and phases out corp. subsidies.  Need a fair tax code, we could leave it at 8%, 14% and 24% for the 3 rates.  Need to address debt and growth.

Wolf to Newt: Some of largest companies, like oil co’s, get govt breaks in form of tax breaks, exemptions, tax loopholes and so forth while making billions.  Is that fair?

Newt:  “I thought for a moment you were gonna refer to GE, which is paying no taxes.” To applause from audience.  “We have a problem with overspending, not with undertaxing.”

Wolf then went to a new question from Virginia, but at least it was somewhat on topic.  The question:  “Would any of you be willing to support the Fair Tax?”  Wolf clarifies that it means a national sales tax.

Romney:              It has a lot going for it, and reduces the burden on lower income and upper income, but not the middle income Americans.  His plan calls for no dividend tax or cap gains for middle income.

At this point, most people must have been confused that not everybody got to answer either of these tax questions, since they were the most popular, and most important to TEA partiers. But that’s the risk you run with a liberal like Wolf moderating.

Executive Orders:  When should they be used?

Paul:      It is often abused, and should never be used to legislate.

Perry:    Would use an exec order to get rid of as much of Obamacare as possible.  Had to clarify several times that he would have gone through legislature instead of exec order to do it again, but there was an opt-out that parents could sign.  He raised $30 million and couldn’t be bought for $5000.

Bachmann:         Attacked Romney’s exec order for cancer vaccine, and Obama’s exec order that insurance companies must offer morning after pills to everyone because he said so.  Claimed the drug company benefiting from Perry’s order had given campaign donations.

Santorum:           Students should be vaccinated at schools, but Perry’s policy was wrong. Give the opt-in rather than opt-out.

How to reduce the cost of health care and health insurance

Cain:      Repeal Obamacare.  Pass market driven, patient centered reform.  Pass loser-pay laws.  Medical liability is big expense because of tort suits.

Romney:              The cost of care is expensive because the patient co-pays and doesn’t know how much it really costs.  Obamacare raises taxes by $500 billion and cuts Medicare by $500B.  Obamacare panels dictate what kind of care you get.

Perry:    Obama said that Romney care was the model for Obamacare. They had the right to do it as a state (Mass) but they wouldn’t do it in Texas.

Paul:      They never turn people away from hospitals.  The churches would take care of those people that didn’t have insurance and needed emergency treatment.  Legalize alternative healthcare, let people practice what they want.

Bachmann:         No state or fed govt should be able to force a person to buy a product or service against their will.  (Best answer)

Plan to remove illegal immigrants from our country

Santorum:           Build the fence and secure the border with personnel, then address who’s already here.  Said Perry allowed in-state tuition for illegals.

Perry:    Govt has been massive failure defending 1200 mile Texas border.  $400M of Texas taxpayer money was spent for Texas rangers on recon missions to get some of these.   Great wall is not reality. Need boots on ground, aviation support, technology.  Fed govt needs to step up and do their constitutional duty of securing the border with Mexico. The choice in his state was giving them in-state tuition or letting them live off taxpayer money.  Only 4 dissenting legislature votes on giving them in-state tuition as long as they were working on citizenship.

Huntsman:          Fix homeland security, fix the root problems.  They gave in UT a separate driving privilege card to illegals so economy could continue to function.

Romney:              Build a fence, don’t give them drivers license or in state tuition.

Energy Independence

Cain:      Need to remove fed govt barriers to independence.  EPA has gone wild.  Need a Regulatory Reduction Commission, with appointees consisting of those that have been abused by the EPA.

Again, we’re not sure why only one person was allowed to answer one of the most important questions.

National Security

Newt:   Congress should be holding hearings now on threats from Iran, Turkey, and Mexico.

Paul:      Quoted Al-Qaeda on why they attacked us, to much displeasure from the crowd.  We have no authority to be policemen of the world, or to conduct nation building.

Santorum:           We were attacked because our civilization is antithetical to theirs.

(Subject changed to protecting women of Afghanistan by implanted Afghan woman)

Huntsman:          Time has come to get out of Afghanistan.  We don’t need nation-builders there when this nation needs to be built.  We can’t help other countries when our core is crumbling.  Need afghan people to take care of their own security.

Perry:    Agreed with Huntsman to bring our soldiers home.  Need conversation on how to deliver aid to those countries, and it’s not with soldiers with targets on back. We need some people there while their military takes control.

What would you bring to the White House as next President?

Examples:

Bush added a horseshoe pit.

Clinton added a jogging track.

Obama added a vegetable garden.

Santorum:           It’s obvious, we have 7 kids; we would add a bedroom and some beds.

Newt:   Reduce the size of it by getting rid of all the czars, creating a lot more space. We’d have music and ballet.

Perry:    Would bring the most beautiful, thoughtful, and incredible first lady this country has ever seen. (Awwww from crowd)

Paul:      Bushel basket of common sense, a course on something about the Austrian economics and business cycle to teach people why fed creates inflation and deflation.

Romney:              “You can count on Americans to get things right, after they exhausted all the alternatives,” by his hero Winston Churchill, whose bust Mitt would return to the Oval Office.

Bachman:            A copy of the Constitution, Declaration of Independence, and Bill of Rights. That’s it.

Cain:      “I would bring a sense of humor because America’s too uptight.”

Huntsman:          Would bring his Harley Davidson and motocross bike.

Here’s Obama’s hypocrisy:

2008: “Navy Seal Team 6 is Cheney’s private assassination team.”
2011: “I put together Seal Team 6 to take out Bin Laden.”

2008: “Bin Laden is innocent until proven guilty, and must be captured alive and given a fair trial.”
2011: “I authorized Seal Team 6 to kill Bin Laden.”

2008: “Guantanamo is entirely unnecessary, and the detainees should not be interrogated.” “I will close Guantanamo.”
2011: “Vital intelligence was obtained from Guantanamo detainees that led to our locating Bin Laden.”

So why the change in heart over all of this? It’s quite simple, his aides told him he had to take credit for this, if it really happened, in order to get re-elected.

Obama is the same jackass whose administration tried to prosecute and court martial 3 Navy Seals for punching a terrorist while capturing him. So they’re not allowed hand to hand combat anymore? Soldiers can shoot, blow up, and otherwise maim the enemy, but can’t use martial arts?

If it sounds confusing, you’re not alone. Obama has no clue what he’s doing, doesn’t understand the purpose of the military, hates our armed forces, and has disdain for the entire Department of Defense. He is a naive, narcissistic, idiot pretending to be president, who will capitalize on any opportunity to lower his growing disapproval numbers.

Obama is not an American. Anyone who harbors such hatred for freedom, limited government, business people of all sorts, capitalism, the US Constitution and the US Armed Forces, and thinks the American people are stupid if they don’t agree with him, does not constitute an American.

In addition, anyone who aspires to increase government spending, taxes, and government control while decreasing the sovereignty, freedoms and bank accounts of the average citizen, can only be called anti-American.

An American is someone who believes in the American way as our founding fathers laid out and provided for us, not one who seeks to destroy it like the abomination called Obama.

History is filled with victory mosques erected by Islamists in their ongoing conquest to conquer the world. The point of a victory mosque is to memorialize the geographical area that the Islamists consider to have conquered. It symbolizes that they have taken control of that territory.

Europe and Asia are filled with these monuments, from the Dome of the Rock, the Blue Mosque, the Sultanahmet Camii, and perhaps most notably, the Cordoba Cathedral, which was a mosque built on a cathedral.

The sites were not chosen randomly. Many of them were formerly Christian or Jewish or Hindu temples, or in close proximity to such. The sacred locations were chosen to symbolize that control was transferred from the other states or religions to the state of Islam.

The mosque planned at 9/11 Ground Zero is the latest in this process that has been going on for centuries. What is interesting about this one, is that it seems premature, considering they have not conquered New York or Manhattan. Or have they?

That depends. If the mosque is allowed to be erected on Park Place in Manhattan, then victory is theirs. It would be the crowning achievement to the 9/11 Islamic terrorist attacks, and it would indicate that they have indeed conquered Manhattan and NYC for that matter.

If it is disallowed as it should be, then there is no victory mosque, and no victory. 9/11 will remain a single battle that Islamofascists have won in an ongoing war that they have been waging against the rest of the world for over a millennium.

The spineless jellyfish that we call politicians in our capitol will do nothing about it, because they don’t want to offend Islam. They are afraid of Islam and would rather appease Islamofascists than put them back in their place.

One of the reasons that large scale, organized terrorist attacks have gone stale in recent years in the west is that they are now considered unnecessary by Islamists.

Indeed they have realized that Islam can take over tolerant, peaceful countries such as the US or GB by infiltrating and taking advantage of our lenient policies. And they are doing so quite effectively.

Replicating at rates double or triple that of other groups or religions in western countries, Islamists are taking over in number. It may take a few decades, but that time is short considering the centuries of brainwashed hatred that has been passed down to the current generations of Islam.

Once they have some numbers, they begin by changing local laws, and getting Shariah law implemented in various municipalities. Then they work their way up to the state and national levels.

It is insidious, much like communism, which it is currently teaming up with toward defeat of a common enemy. The appeasing communists will simply be eaten last by the crocodile, as predicted by Winston Churchill.

This is not about freedom of religion. For the moment let’s put aside the fact that the main proponent of the mosque is a radical muslim cleric who espouses the typical Islamic hatred of America and its ‘infidels’.

The US Dept of Justice under Clinton went after Branch Davidians by violent means, calling them a cult because they were harboring guns, which are still legal in the US for now, even if the leftists believe they shouldn’t be.

A cult is allowed under law if it doesn’t harm anyone. That can’t be said of Islam. Their ‘religion’ preaches hatred and the murder of ‘infidels’, meaning those of us who don’t believe what they do.

Is that not truly the definition of a cult? A group that preaches and executes the killing of others arbitrarily for not being a part of their cult.

The solution is that America has to realize that Islam is a violent cult, and it must be treated as such. That is, if there is still an America, which is a matter of debate.

Until then, Islamists will continue to take over, one victory mosque at a time.

Update: Attack # 18 came on December 25, 2009 as a Nigerian muslim attempted to ignite explosives on an airliner in Detroit, wishing everyone a Christmas as miserable as he is. Nobody was injured except himself.

Another radical muslim has just commited yet another terrorist act on our own US soil. Army Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, an admitted muslim, conducted his own jihad at the Fort Hood US Army base in Texas, leaving 13 dead and 29 others wounded, in the largest US terrorist attack since 2001.

Add this to the list of other individual radical muslim jihads since 9/11/2001:

· Muslim soldier who murdered his officers at US Army base in Kuwait in 2003 killing two

· Radical muslim imam has a shoot out with feds in Detroit last month and dies, fortunately

· Muslim fanatic attacked an Arkansas recruiting station in June of this year killing one

· New York muslim cable TV network owner beheads his wife in Feburary this year

· Muslim father ran over his own daughter in Arizona for being “too westernized” she lived

· 5 muslims arrested in 2007 for plot to kill Army members at Fort Dix NJ (3 were illegal aliens)

· Bosnian muslim in 2007 shoots up the Trolley Square in Utah leaving 5 dead, 4 wounded

· Muslim stole a car in Minneapolis and rammed other drivers in the name of Allah

· Muslim ran over people in San Francisco 2006 with his SUV, telling police he was a terrorist

· Muslim goes on a shooting rampage at Jewish community center in Seattle 2006

· Muslim student runs over students with SUV at a NC campus in 2006 to protest Iraq war

· Muslim student in OK blew himself up with a backpack bomb in 2005 outside of football stadium

· Egyptian muslim opened fire at LAX killing 2 and wounding 4 in 2002

· Saudi muslim student in Houston decapitated his Jewish “friend” in 2003

· Two gay muslims terrorize the entire national capital area in 2002, taking pot shots from the back of a car, known as the infamous “DC snipers” 13 total dead including previous shootings

· Muslim opened fire at New Orleans airport ticket counter in 2002, killing 1

That is a total of 17 terrorist attacks since 9/11 that I know of. There are perhaps others that the media successfully covered up, as they are very good at. Did you have any idea the count was that high?

The death toll is now 38, with dozens more injured, and untold millions terrorized.

If you notice, there is one thing all these attacks have in common: they were all conducted by muslims against unsuspecting people, in a cowardly manner. Another thing they have in common is that the government and media refuse to call them terrorist attacks.

Guns are not at fault here. Note in the list of above terrorist attacks, the diversity of weapons: guns, knives, bombs, and cars. A lot of people have cars, should we outlaw them?

Soldiers reported that Hasan shouted “Allahu Akbar!” while shooting at dozens of unarmed employees. This phrase, which means “Allah is great,” is always repeated by Islamo-fascist terrorists. It has something to do with their mental self-justification for doing something they know is a terrible crime.

Clearly, Hasan and his radical Islamic ideology are at fault, but also complicit in this act is political correctness, the same which has already compromised free speech, and has now compromised our own military, and with it our national security.

The signs of trouble were visible early in his career. In Army medical school, students and faculty both knew that Hasan had problems. In fact, one even told him so. “I told him, `There’s something wrong with you,’” said Osman Danquah, co-founder of the Islamic Community of Greater Killeen. “I didn’t get the feeling he was talking for himself, but something just didn’t seem right.”

His fellow students complained to the faculty about Hasan’s “anti-American propaganda,” but said a fear of appearing discriminatory against a Muslim student kept officers from filing a formal written complaint. You heard it right. Anti-American propaganda, and yet he stayed in the US army because of political correctness.

Dr. Finnel, who studied with him at medical school, said Hasan made a presentation that justified suicide bombing, spewed out anti-American propaganda, and argued that the war on terror was a war against Islam. Finnel and another student complained about him, but no formal complaint was filed.

Hasan received a poor performance evaluation, and had some problems that required counseling and additional supervision. Some of the doctors even reported that he had mental health problems. Despite all of this, they graduated him and promoted him to Major upon his graduation from the medical center.

But the story goes back to his youth, when Hasan attended a mosque in Falls Church that has been linked to 9/11 terrorists and al-Qaeda. The former imam of such mosque is a radical muslim known to be connected to al-Qaeda, named Anwar al-Awlaki, was in fact the leader of that temple while Hasan attended.

Awlaki praised the recent actions of Hasan:

“Nidal Hassan is a hero. He is a man of conscience who could not bear living the contradiction of being a Muslim and serving in an army that is fighting against his own people,” wrote al-Aulaqi, who now lives in Yemen since leaving the U.S. in 2002. “This is a contradiction that many Muslims brush aside and just pretend that it doesn’t exist. Any decent Muslim cannot live, understanding properly his duties towards his Creator and his fellow Muslims, and yet serve as a US soldier.”

I will agree with Awlaki on one point, that a muslim can not properly serve Islam and serve as a US soldier. I would strike the word “decent” and replace with “devout.”

During his time at Ft Hood, Hassan, who was a psychiatrist, was assigned to counseling soldiers returning home from war. So we had a psychotic doctor counseling other soldiers. That’s efficient. In this capacity, he told them to question whether their sacrifices in fighting the war were worth it, and argued with them about the nature of the war.

Hasan also warned a room full of senior Army physicians in early 2008, that to avoid adverse events, the military should allow muslim soldiers to be released as conscientious objectors instead of fighting in wars against other muslims.

Hasan was supposed to be making a presentation on a medical topic, but instead lectured them on Islam, suicide bombers, and threats the military could encounter from muslims conflicted about fighting in muslim countries. “It’s getting harder and harder for Muslims in the service to morally justify being in a military that seems constantly engaged against fellow Muslims,” he said in the presentation.

He was right that there would be problems, but apparently nobody knew he was talking about himself. I would have had one question for him: Why the hell are you still in the Army if you so vehemently disagree with everything they do?

The last bullet point on one page reads simply: “We love death more then (sic) you love life!” Ok, in the future I would advise these type of muslims to just kill themselves if they love death. Those of us that are normal people, don’t like it.

Under the “Conclusions” page, Hasan wrote that “Fighting to establish an Islamic State to please God, even by force, is condoned by the Islam,” and that “Muslim Soldiers should not serve in any capacity that renders them at risk to hurting/killing believers unjustly — will vary!”

The final page, labeled “Recommendation,” contained only one suggestion:

“Department of Defense should allow Muslims [sic] Soldiers the option of being released as ‘Conscientious objectors’ to increase troop morale and decrease adverse events.”

So this is the gratuity he shows the Army for sending him to medical school for free, paying him to be a subpar employee that constantly sought to undermine their mission and beliefs. A room full of dead soldiers.

On top of all of this, US Intelligence knew long before the attack, that Hasan has been in contact with an al-Qaeda sympathizer. About that term, in my book if you are a terrorist sympathizer, then you are a terrorist suspect. I mean, do we really have to assume you’re NOT going to act on your beliefs?

Hasan also showed some final typical warning signs, giving away belongings to others, saying good bye to friends and neighbors, and attending a local strip club named Starz several times in his final weeks before the attack. He assumed that he would end up dying in the attack, which he should have.

Hasan had also been in contact in 2008 with the same radical cleric named Awlaki referenced above, and federal authorities knew it. What did they do about it? Apparently, nothing. My guess is they were concerned about being accused of “profiling.”

Profiling is a term that in the past was used to describe a process by which law enforcement was doing their job correctly by singling out various individuals for surveillance who fit the profile of a criminal or terrorist. Now, it is a derogatory term and considered racist by the liberal media and others who collectively comprise the politically correct thought police.

In short, a process that used to protect our people by preventing crimes by would-be criminals, or at least bringing them to justice, is now itself a crime. That makes a lot of sense.

This “political correctness” movement is a thought control device used by communists, to not let people speak truths that they don’t want to hear. It has successfully infected all levels of our society, law enforcement, and now even the military.

But once the military and federal intelligence agencies are afraid to report the truth about someone who is obviously an Islamo-fascist wacko, what line of defense do we have against them? Who do we appeal to when they won’t do their job of eradicating extremists from their own ranks?

I would appeal to the American people as a whole. Stop complying with the communist thought police. Speak out about things you know are wrong. Don’t accept the dereliction of duty by federal employees. Don’t tolerate elected officials who try to sweep this under the rug or pretend it’s not a problem.

When we have a list of 17 terrorist attacks with 38 dead, and over 50 wounded, and millions terrorized, then it is definitely a problem.

We the people have a unique ability that is not available in most countries. That is, we can fire our elected public officials when we don’t agree with their policies (as long as we don’t let Acorn and other communist organizations undermine our vote with fraudulent election practices.)

Stop voting for that old windbag just because he or she brings pork into your state or district. If you’re a taxpayer, you’re paying for that pork anyway. Is it really worth sacrificing your own safety and that of your friends and neighbors?

Terrorism in this country is unacceptable. It may be acceptable in other countries, but not mine. I’m tired of living in my realistic fear that there is a radical muslim just around the corner, who may just be planning a terrorist attack.

Why do we have to live like this? We DON’T have to. We need to stand up for our rights to not be terrorized. We know who these people are. We know what mosques preach this kind of hatred. We need our law enforcement officials to protect us. Don’t accept anything less.

We can’t continue to stick our heads in the sand and pretend we don’t know what the problem is. The matter needs to be discussed and resolved. Radical muslims can not be allowed to exist in our society. I don’t care what we do with them, just get rid of them. Are you listening Congress?

]]> http://realdealpolitics.com/blog/ft-hood-taking-responsibility-for-the-latest-terrorist-attack/feed/ 0